The Latest Fossil Claim of the Theory
of Evolution has also Become History
The theory of evolution met a crushingdefeat
in palaeontology as well in biochemical topics such as genes, DNA
and the cell systems. Fossils demonstrate that living species did
not evolve from each other, but were created separately with their
individual specific characteristics.
According to the theory of evolution, all living
species evolved from one another. A previously-existing species
turned into another species over time and all species came into
being in this manner. According to the theory, this transformation
has been over a very long period of hundreds of millions of years
and proceeded gradually.
In that case, numerous "intermediary species"
should have originated and lived within this long alleged transformation
instance, some half-fish/half-reptiles should have lived in the
past which had acquired some reptilian traits in addition to the
fish traits they already had. Or some reptile-birds should have
originated which had acquired some bird traits in addition to the
reptilian traits they already had. Since they were in a transitory
period, they had to be crippled, deficient, and defective living
beings. Evolutionists refer to these theoretical creatures, which
they believe to have lived in the past, as "transitional forms".
If such animals had really existed in the past,
there should be millions and even billions of them in number and
variety. Darwinism is shattered right at this point, because there
is not a single trace of these imaginary "intermediate transitional
This fact has been known for a long time. Yet
evolutionists speculated on a few fossils, trying to present them
as "intermediate transitional forms" and comforted themselves
saying, "only a few intermediate forms have been found so far,
but in the future all of them will be unearthed". The most
important fossil presented as an intermediate form was a 150-million-year-old
extinct bird fossil called Archaeopteryx. Evolutionists claimed
that this bird had reptilian traits. Despite the fact that their
claims have been refuted one by one and that it has been proved
that Archaeopteryx was not an intermediate transitional form but
a flying bird species, they desperately embraced this last fossil
"Fossil Discovery Threatens Theory of Birds' Evolution"
Fossil Discovery Threatens Theory of Birds' Evolution:A news
item based on a news item that appeared in New York Times
on June 23, 2000 headlined "Fossil Discovery Threatens Theory
At last, a fossil discovered during recent weeks,
definitely overthrew this last hope of evolutionists. As quoted
from the evolutionist sources, a fossil was discovered which revealed
that the ancient ancestor of birds was not a dinosaur or any other
living being but a bird.
News about this discovery first appeared in the
world media on June 23, 2000, in New York Times with the headline
"Fossil Discovery Threatens Theory of Birds' Evolution".
This article was about a bird which was recently unearthed in the
Middle East. Prominent scientific journals such as Science and Nature
and the world-renowned TV station BBC announced the recent developments
as follows: "It has been discovered that the fossil, which
is unearthed in the Middle East and estimated to have lived 220
million years ago, is covered with feathers, has a wishbone just
like Archaeopteryx and modern birds do, and there are hollow shafts
in its feathers. THIS INVALIDATES THE CLAIMS THAT ARCHAEOPTERYX
IS THE ANCESTOR OF BIRDS, because the fossil discovered is 75 million
years older than Archaeopteryx. This means that A REAL BIRD WITH
ALL ITS CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES ALREADY EXISTED 75 MILLION YEARS
BEFORE THE CREATURE WHICH WAS ALLEGED TO BE THE ANCESTOR OF BIRDS."
A Milestone in the History of the Palaeontology
The admission by evolutionists themselves that
Archaeopteryx is not an "intermediate transitional form"
to serve as evidence for evolution is an important milestone in
the history of palaeontology. This is because for about 150 years,
Archaeopteryx has continued to be the most prominent among the very
few so-called "intermediate transitional forms" evolutionists
could advance. However, this door of escape is also closed now,
and the world of palaeontology has had to face the plain truth thatthere
is not even a single fossil which can provide evidence for evolution.
The outcomes are evident. The New York Times
also accepted that fact and ran the headline "Fossil Discovery
Threatens Theory of Birds' Evolution." That is true. Indeed,
the ancestor of birds was a bird. The ancestor of fish was a fish,
the ancestor of horses was a horse, the ancestor of kangaroos was
a kangaroo and the ancestor of man was a man. In other words, all
different classes of living beings emerged in the perfect and specific
forms they have today. In other words, they are created by God.
The conservative resistance evolutionists show
towards this evident fact has now lost its last cornerstone.
In our other studies on the invalidity of the theory of evolution,
we had explained that Arhaeopteryx is not a living being in
between bird-dinosaur, but an extinct bird species which could
fly just like the modern birds. Despite this fact, some evolutionist
publications still accepted Archaeopteryx as the "primitive
ancestor of birds" and repeat the tale of "dinosaurs are the
ancestors of birds". Above is seen misleading coverage in
New Scientist , National Geographic, and New York Times about
Archaeopteryx. Finally, however, truths have been revealed
and even evolutionist publications had to admit the collapse
of the Archaeopteryx myth.